Though your video also gave weight to several points in this article. Thanks for the forewarning.Īirdip wrote:I watched your clip and commend you on your driving ability. I was contimplating having a look at this title but I can see it would have been much of the same. Personally, I can't remember the last time I played a WRC game that had all the major points dialed in. There are a few occasions during your run that you either cut corners or are off the track, there doesn't seem to be any discernible difference between the tarmac, ice or mud/gravel on the side of the road or for that matter, having your car in different positions on the road as there isn't any noticeable camber. The handling of the car looks very simplistic also. The pace note reading is terrible, they would have done a better job having Siri read the notes. I watched your clip and commend you on your driving ability. And, for confirming your (empty) words about "too easy", why not to beat my result at presented stage?
#Wrc 10 forum movie
Simply watch to car behaviour on icy asphalt in my movie and in DR, and realize, that you abuse "arcade" the game wigh at least good physics simulation, and give as simulation pattern poor railway arcade.
But it would be better if they watch into true's eyes, as like as you also. LaPremier wrote:Of course, at Codemasters forum they found excuse quickly for ban me. But its double sad to see such people in the rows of review writers. But WRC 5 is just first TRUE RALLY GAME for entire decade, and its really sad, that these times of "dirt" playing forced so many persons to accept masochistic gameplay with ugly stupid handling as "simulation" and deprived them of the ability to see physics' beauty and enjoy of rally driving. So, in this sense this game is much better (and, of course, much more realistic), than previous WRC title games and, of course, much better, than all Dirts, which, with their flat one-dimensional physics model cannot be counted as rally games at all. We meet well developed, multidimentional model of tyres-road interaction, which count grip and inertia in their dynamical interaction and allow us to use brake, gas and wheel simultaneously in sensible, sophisiticated and beautifull maneuvers. Its the first rally game from times of Richard Burnes Rally, which not only does not insult my physical intuition, but give enjoyment for each turn passing. Ugly and absurding scripts, sometimes pilled up above Dirt 3 railway arcade model - its just a content, which for such "specialist" serve as ideal!īut WRC 5 has really brilliant car physics model. So, just Dirt Rally is an arcade since it HAS NOT AT ALL consequentive model of tyres-road interaction, it does not imitate car sliding and dont support POWER SLIDE - the main rally driving intake.
For me, who in mentioned Codemasters' game occupied regularry top ten positions in online eventes with thousands of participants, WRC 5 dont seems to be too easy and easier at all - but they cries!. So, he even havent try, but print his conclusions.Īnd really, of course, we know, that the game is, vise versa, too hard for him and other RAILWAY DRIVERS, played before only Dirt and now expressing their wounding and impotence in playing without railway, they enjoyed in Dirt Rally also. But even in case he able - he can compete with other players from online results table presented for each stage. I can, first of all, mention, that the author will be NEVER able to pass any track at highest difficulty level. Where you see arcade, what a reason? If its too easy. God saves, its first review linked at metascore, where we read about "arcade". Its really astonishing, how unqualified people can write review at such portal! He is not alone, of course, simpletons from Dirt community cries the same at forums, but to repeat it in article.
0 kommentar(er)
